Lübeck — Case Study 03 / Canadian OEM Servo-Controlled Alignment
Home/ Case Studies/ Canadian OEM — Crankshafts
03 Automotive · Canadian OEM

Migration from manual crankshaft alignment to servo-controlled station — measurement noise from 120 µm to 7 µm

Servo control LVDT Keyence Kistler load cell Crankshafts

The previous process was manual: measure run-out with a dial indicator, mark the high point with a marker, strike with a hard polymer hammer, and repeat 3 or 4 times. Up to 6 minutes per part. And a metrological problem the client didn't know about: the manual system had more noise than tolerance.

Servo-controlled crankshaft alignment station designed by Lübeck
Client
Canadian OEM
Active manufacturing
120→7 µm
Measurement noise reduced
20 kN
Alignment force capacity
max. 3
Alignment attempts per part
100%
Piece-by-piece traceability with Data Matrix
// 01 · Challenge

The manual system had more noise than tolerance

The previous process was entirely manual and operator-dependent: measure the run-out of the crankshaft taper with a dial indicator, mark the high point with a marker, take the part to a fixture, strike with a hard polymer hammer, measure again. If not in spec, repeat 3 or 4 times. Up to 6 minutes per part if the assembly arrives with 200–300 µm of initial deviation.

But the more serious problem was metrological and the client didn't know it: the indicator, resting on the tapered geometry without limiting axial movement of the assembly, read 120 µm of noise — when the product tolerance is 80 µm. The measurement system guaranteed nothing.

120 µm measurement noise vs 80 µm product tolerance
Up to 6 minutes per part with 3–4 manual hammer reworks
Ergonomic risk from repetitive impact
No pre-specified alignment force — had to be parameterized on the floor
// 02 · Solution

Metrology independent of force — 4 iterations down to 7 µm

The measurement system and the force system are two independent mechanisms in the same fixture: the force chain never touches the measurement chain. Reaching 7 µm of noise required 4 engineering iterations on the floor.

HMI interface with crankshaft alignment measurement graph — Lübeck Real-time control software — per-part alignment curve
Automation electrical panel with Siemens PLC and servo drive — Lübeck Electrical panel — Siemens PLC + servo drive
1

Keyence GT2-A12 LVDT + Kistler 9333A load cell

Independent metrology and force. Servomotor with 1:5 reducer for inertia balance. Two supports with super-precision bearings. Kistler load cell with 50 kN capacity.

2

Electric ball screw actuator

Servomotor with brake. 20 kN capacity (measured manual operator force: 7.7 kN). Guided system that absorbs bending moments to extend service life.

3

4 engineering iterations

1:5 reducer on rotation servomotor. Supplier change for pulleys with CMM certification. Anti-bending center supports. LVDT relocation to the base of the rotation mechanism.

4

Traceability with Keyence SR-X300 reader

Crankshaft Data Matrix read automatically. Local database with: number of times processed, run-out per degree of rotation, applied force, servo position and speed.

// 03 · Result

Measurement noise from 120 µm to 7 µm — the system now assures

Measurement noise: 120 µm → 7 µm — from a manual system that had more noise than tolerance (80 µm) to one that measures with real margin.
From 6 manual minutes with 3–4 reworks to a measured process with a maximum of 3 automatic alignment attempts.
Elimination of ergonomic risk from repetitive hammer striking and floor impact noise.
Piece-by-piece traceability with sinusoidal run-out graph stored in local database. Designed to feed a feedback algorithm starting from 1,000 historical parts.
Pneumatic system with CKD valves inside the alignment station — Lübeck Pneumatic system with CKD valves — integrated precision components
Servo-controlled alignment station at Lübeck Bajío workshop Lübeck Bajío facilities — fabrication and testing in-house

"Shift-to-shift variability was the real problem. By converting alignment to an automatic process, we eliminated the variability — not the operator's fault."

— Lübeck Engineering, case 03 analysis
// Do you have a process that depends on operator skill?

We automate it.
Process, not luck.

If you have shift-to-shift variability or operator dependence at critical assembly or measurement points, let's talk diagnostics before proposing a solution.